Advertisement: GAZPROM.
Posts
Consumption is most important; the ability to consume even if you are to see the real power of supply and demand. Increasing demand by increasing the population that could buy a good only increases the size of the market. They will demand and covet the particular good or goods but how do they buy the goods that are made by machines if you they do not have money...... or some means of income as you do not use or need them for work which is now done by machines? Demand will still stay up while the price will have to go down since you need consumers and a body is not a consumer unless it has money. In automation, you need to fuel the bodies with money if not immediate alternative or fictitious labor but with cash just as soon as labor is displaced from any newly automated process. So, maybe the idea of playing with the concept of supply and demand did not really help during the depression. It seems that someone thought that if you increase demand for goods by increasing the population, the goods being produced by machines will sell. But, you have not addressed the issue of income. How can the goods sell? When you are displacing humans from the industrial process with automation and are therefore removing them from economic participation with this automation, you have a question. If they are not given occupations of some kind after several years of training in school, school that does not seem to counteract the negativity of tv sufficiently these days although beauty school might be a better idea since you learn how to open a business and they could teach you that in one class in Grade 10 marketing class at 'A^so' ville or 'A"soton' High School, how will they have money when you are displacing them logically from the industrial process if you do not follow the rest of what logic dictates? Whether or not you increase the population where do they get money when they are displaced from the economic participation as workers but you want to see consumption? Now, John Dillinger and Capone may have had other reasons other than money for their behaviors like illegal foreclosures on properties as perpetrated by White Guyanese who were supported by something extra territorial or trans Atlantic but we don't really know for sure bu what we do know is...well, let's take a look at happened. You frustrated the plans of Winstron to bring basic income to the English people...with a war to stoke economic stimulation but peace is just as good of a motive to get everybody working or consuming. The basic income could be tied to some kind of work that makes the entire community safer and takes the stress off of bus drivers, ambulance drivers and also school teacher who could work three days on and three days off along with College lecturers. You must not try to bend the A!SS. You must bend yourself. How will they have money unless you give them participatory remuneration? This is also known as basic income. Now, you could blame Japan but is there something you do not understand? You could blame Germany but the money saved is inexplicable. I know you need something to do. But, customer satisfaction is also an issue. It's YOU! This is what you requested and you do spend a lot of time having roller coaster fun in your moto; you joy ridda you! The point is that will you throw away a microwave that saves you time and money? What about the washing machine? What if you could buy ten washing machines and open a laundry? Your neighbors would just drop off the clothes at your house and you do the work; right at home!!! You say '...this Black guy is like reverse affirmative action. He gives me his ideas for free since I can't believe my own education.' A ha ha ha ha! Now, Toyota in Kentucky is eating his lunch with chopsticks although a knife and fork in your culture could be more efficient but maybe you spend more time washing afterwards and less time respecting your wife while you jerk yourself off right in front of her and now he only rubs your ears but she does get undressed in front of you and now you decided to just give her all of your energy and just watch her A"ss and punanee>....................BEEEEEEEEE...blow the horn! Big UP Selecta!!!! Now, I am not entirely sure what is the issue constraining your human creativity but it can't be the black guy who offered a few ideas for free and it might have been easier to phone him but could you and F£$ckbacks Coffee be on the wrong wave length as you drink soo much of it that you can't...you just can't see that if you have not phoned him or emailed when he said the idea is for free, then your real motive is your resentment as the coffee is making you all victims of some kind of mass autism....so....fack off then. Butter Channel(TM), Angel Ronan(TM) or Auto Show(TM) are no longer for free and nor will he wipe your nose or tie your shoe laces. Cheers mate and now just sod off! Ta! ''Say Rakweedish, aren't you from Mumbai?'' Rakweedish responded and said, ''..Bouy..a really don't know what part de me come from but yes..me is an Indian....but you should leave de people dem alone fe do de work..yah understand and watch de butter channel nuh are de Bien Sur...because....you just haveee try and....relax yourself mon...sekkle yourself....Respect...Mais Il n'est pas difficile; no?''
So, you really could not be saying that you don't know how to use a camera or run a website. But, what I have done is offer Auto Show(TM), Butter channnel(TM) and Angel Ronan(TM) as my effort at a reverse affirmative action although there is no affirmative action now and nor did they have any affirmative action where I went to school. No; they don't give people employee of the year awards as a means of affirmative action. Do you think they let Black people graduate with affirmative action because if they do, we would have a lot of people with degrees regardless of complexion who used my essays? But, affirmative action does not affirm cheating and nor does the lee way granted to anyone who can prove with history and diagnosis that they have learning difficulty.
Just be honest....you want to do this again; that is rely on a war for economic stimulation but you have already relied on Asia for your industrialism and respect for automation and also you have relied on their population for the Asian's respect for basic income as the final '' trigonometrically'' perfect answer to blessed economic reality called rest and play and you can still do something maybe but there will never be enough of anything to do if you can cut an expensive human being out of the process in favor of a machine and the economy will pay the human his participatory due for consumption in basic income so that there is a balance on the production side of the equation with its automating and mechanized efficiency as balanced with the consumption on the other side of the economy. Martians cannot consume our product and Japan is not looking to build vehicles in America for export to Mars or back to Japan. on Impact of World War II on the U.S. Economy and Workforce | World War II ...
There was an argument concerning fuel and this future and they had a war to resolve it and also hide even momentarily certain technologies or discoveries to sell more fuel. But, today mobile phone companies generate more profit than the average fuel companies. Turn vehicles into mobile phones essentially in terms of overhead but keep the current average monthly cost of fuel the same. The cost of overhead of drilling and processing fossil fuels along with transportation is evident before you could even sell a gallon beside some coffee in a gas station. The production is very expensive and exceeds by 12 times the cost of producing 1 kpa. The cost of using water for algae also threatens our human future as water becomes an issue with a planet that will always be growing warmer as it moves closer to the sun very very slowly but surely over the centuries and millenniums. In the man time, airline fuels that plug and refill the ozone layer with a man made ozone chemical will help along with fewer and certainly unnecessary but very expensive fossil fuels. 'Eve's' or EV's should not have free municipal charging stations but they are not very efficient in terms of time and consumer usage when refueling and why isn't the charging absolutely regenerative for a battery that size with such limited range and is the battery absolutely recyclable. No; I have a better idea for 'Eve' and her environmental consciousness so we could just le them make their statement in protest bit longer about fuel and it is at least going in the right emotive direction although we could build anything for Eve that is much more to the point environmentally and technologically if you really want to recharge your drive-able epilady shaver with a cord which is essentially redundant but rather a cute vehicle or vehicles with plugs hanging off of them for now. The advertising was also quite intelligent; very intelligent. But, the vehicle I need or that we need already exists. Did you know the regenerative electricity generated in the the 2017 Civic with its electric motors on each wheel hub recharges its electric battery continuously and its battery is bigger than a LEaf battery and a Tesla battery but the vehicle does not need to stop and be plugged in. Regenerative vehicular transportation is here. It is very intelligent in giving us what we really want also; like basic income which is economically regenerative on the consumption side of an economy while automation addresses trillions of dollars saved in both labor costs and material costs in the avoidance of waste with better products. Going back to the regenerative vehicle, it also has a gasoline engine and obtained about 10 free energy electric kilometers for every 1 kilometer in driving. This is still feeding an industry; the fuel industry and there is still one step further. The vehicle I need should still feed an economy and industry; a fuel industry. So, the ideal notion is the fuel cell. Program the vehicle to operate for 700 kms on the electronically controlled full tank before refueling is required. The industry will also calculate equivalent earning per kpa of hydrogen or propane for a fuel cell or internal combustion fueled by non-liquid gas as they earn per litre or per gallon.
