The problem is that American Capitalism focussed on efficiency with production and this led to automation to feed a mass market but after automation, they struggled. They struggled to compute human value in capitalism AS THE Market. Employment falls with automation. The grocery store cashier who was happy as a cashier for 40 or more years is now facing automation and unemployment yet she will probably get a job in a Hotel with her face to face customer experience or maybe a job as a school assistant three days on and three days off. Either way, her and the train driver and the warehouse worker who faced automation will get some basic income to feed the market. The corporate tax that is a contribution to the basic income is rolled into the loans the corporation is paying back to the government as the government provided loans and helped them finance the cost of robotic automation. Markets contract; they shrink as there are fewer people with cash on hand. You could massage the situation with the immigrants and the monies you have always been willing to give to them and you would bring trillions of people and give them money maybe while you deny your own in the fuelling the market. You noticed the Armenian wears your shoes just like the pilgrim but at the moment of calculating human value, the refugee was given money and used to bolster economic markets along with Latin Americans, Ukranians, Russians and West indians but in the end, soap is soap and toilet paper is paper. The point is that American capitalism was right about choice, the ramen menu, but fails on American or Amerindian human valuation. This is wear French Capitalism and the more Stoic old Russian Capitalism(formerly known as Communism) succeed and succeeded with respecting human life as the market in the function of consuming the finished product; as there can only be national capitalist systems in a Capitalist world economy. The French and the Russians put in Basic income at the beginning of the industrial age. The French promoted choice in products. The Russians had less market diversification but both systems respected the need to create a market with basic income and value the human for the consumption of finished products. The Americans have been wondering how they can value themselves as their own value is a matter of chance while they value the foreigner; celebrating them until they are signatories to any kind of Amerieducation!

The problem is that American Capitalism focussed on efficiency with production and this led to automation to feed a mass market  but after automation, they struggled. They struggled to compute human value in capitalism AS THE Market.   Employment falls with automation.  The grocery store cashier who was happy as a cashier for 40 or more years is now facing automation and unemployment yet she will probably get a job in a Hotel with her face to face customer experience or maybe a job as a school assistant  three days on and three days off.  Either way, her and the train driver and the warehouse worker who faced automation will get some basic income to feed the market.  The corporate tax that is a contribution to the basic income is rolled into the loans the corporation is paying back to the government as the government provided loans and  helped them finance the cost of robotic automation.  Markets contract; they shrink as there are fewer people with cash on hand. You could massage the situation with the immigrants and the monies you have always been willing to give to them and you would bring trillions of people and give them money maybe while you deny your own in the fuelling the market. You noticed the Armenian wears your shoes just like the pilgrim but at the moment of calculating human value, the refugee
 was given money and used to bolster economic markets along with Latin Americans, Ukranians, Russians and West indians but in the end, soap is soap and toilet paper is paper. The point is that American capitalism was right about choice, the ramen menu,  but fails on American or Amerindian human valuation. This is wear French Capitalism and
 the more Stoic old Russian Capitalism(formerly  known as Communism) succeed and succeeded with respecting human life as the market in the function of consuming the finished product; as there can only be national capitalist systems in a Capitalist world economy. The French and the Russians put in Basic income at the beginning of the industrial age. The French promoted choice in products. The Russians had less market diversification but both systems respected the need to create a market with basic income and value the human for  the consumption of finished products.   The Americans have been wondering how they can value themselves as their own value is a matter of chance while they value the foreigner; celebrating them until they are signatories to any kind of Amerieducation!