Automotive Television 03/01/2024. The Xiaomi SU7.

   

Automotive Television

08/01/2024.

The Xiaomi SU7.

Do you remember that 1980's show called Night Rider about a driverless, talking American sports car?    This car, the SU7,  begins with the future and then attempts to adopt the human in the current  and less advanced automotive generation. It is realization of every electric and driverless vehicle expectation and is maybe more of what is to come from other manufacturers in years to come although, like as if from the future, it is already here but from a Xiaomi  Mobile Phone Corporation as the SU7.  It is designed by a mobile phone manufacturer and not by the usual mainstream automotive manufacturer.  Is it a Taycan competitor?   It is not necessarily boasting luxury materials but is offering leadership on the harmonization of wheels with doors, regenerative electric engines and with every aspect of onboard miraculous driverless capability; along with super network connectivity. Most importantly, it is not awkward and I wonder if it might be easier for a major manufacturer to order its own branded versions; maybe with more aggressive and expressive wheel and rims hardware; as a Koenigsegg regular consumer product, a  Buick, Ford  or a Vauxhall maybe. It could be an Alfa Romeo with Alfa's wondrous Italia design expressions that remind us of the importance of that self respecting, self preservative basic instinct. Every North American should have an income support of no less than $ USD 120,000.00 per year; that is 24 cents a minute paid every minute 365 and per year and disbursed by direct bank account transfer to the consumer citizen every day or every two weeks.  

We cannot expect the machines to buy the vehicles for us. They build the vehicles; machines building machines. This was achieved, however, with loans made by our governments to automotive corporations with money collected from our sales tax expenditures and ironically income tax dollars also.  It is unfortunate that ownership is now more than 50% foreign ownership with respect to these       Anglo, US automotive corporations (some 70% owned by an Asian company) and the only one real commitment that we have to make in this great deal is to ourselves; the consumer in that we must guarantee ourselves an income support that amounts to a small fraction of the money invested in robotic production and the money saved in wages and employment costs. Its the requisite pride and dignity at 24 cents per minute that covers you as you go and look for the pride and dignity of a job.  I love the North American consumer.  

This money invested in robotics is energy; energy  saved also and energy invested/input is never lost but only transferred; or it should  be in this case to the consumer on the consumer side of the equation and yet this transfer  of energy can be impeded by our own awkwardness or stubbornness.   The money  invested in robotics came from government loans to Anglo car companies and that money was collected from consumer sales tax; and income taxes ironically that built the machines that led to the automation that causes the joblessness caused by that automation that always leads to less economic activity in the site of more robotic automation.   The ,24 cents per minute  is the necessary energy to be transferred to the consumer to balance out the economy. 

The machines work 24 hours a day.  The consumer buys and sells 24 hours per day also on-line.  You don't have to wait as you once did for the store to be open before you make your transaction.  

We are not trying to teach anyone anything. Its not a sin to discuss it.   24 cents a minute per citizen is this small fraction of money to be returned to and invested in  the consumer on the consumer buying side of our economic equation.  24 cents a minute is $14.40 per hour per consumer. That is nothing. 

The alternative view is to fund the economy only with work and wages and little income support benefit,. attempting to provoke work (building products without actual product orders) even when automation takes jobs away; provoke work with war as the final  desperate Anglo solution.   This is when you are dishonest about the impact of automation.  The war dissipates your population; dissipates  your market of buyers and American families.  Sze Sze. Ābhāra    You then become reliant  on other populations for positive population numbers.  Sze Sze. Ābhāra  Yet, there is always less work due to automation. There would therefore be less sales as evidenced in a protracted recession so then the car company asks  the government to give the car company the money intended for the population of consumer buyers in that desperation after Laisez Faire waiting For the market and economy to correct itself with the move of the hand of God. Maybe God told you what to do in the moving of His wisdom.      But instead, we say   that we can at least look together at the big American company and have a sense of collective  bigness and hegemony and pride that way; but no or low sales and a financially non participatory population; that means no consistent market of buyers with the ability  to pay.  We would  provoke a war to cover this to see more government orders, orders of some kind,  if not consumers and consumer orders and then people would be called on in this new volume to work. 

 It does not help as much these days as much of the work, no matter what, is carried out by machines.  We can pretend this is reproductive.  

  This is called the Government Industrial Complex.   The companies  are now majority foreign owned; not American but we can pretend it works and that this way is reproductive.  Your economy is still missing consumer stimulus across all sectors with the insufficient income support per consumer in the current diatribe. America is actually suffering depopulation and a reversal of urbanisation due to the underfunded economy. See Siberia, California or Daggert, California.  Why would any town be abandoned in California regardless of the amount of joblessness caused by automation? Any town as still a place to live. Across North America, would It be that a town in  cold New Brunswick is more likely to survive automation than a town in California due to New Brunswick's consistent income support of only $20,000.00 per year in that cold? I wonder why it's only $20,000.00 in 2023 and far below the cost of living? We love the Canadian car buyer.  

 To enjoy the automation economy, you only needed to apply between 6 cents per minute  back in the 1960s at the time of JFK's assassination and now 24 cents per minute in the current era is requisite to achieve the global economy's range of  the normal in terms of expected consumer activities, consumer stimulus and the profit return on production.  How much do you think is sufficient? The 24 cents comes from the same place that the loans to build  the robots  comes from; the consumer  sales tax.   

No matter what,  consumers with no money would mean no sales after increased automation. Machines are driving people around.  This is the SU7.  There is always  more automation such that the underfunded economy with underfunded consumers does not help anyone.  Would you fund only some consumers;  but not all?   It would not achieve your  Hegemonic economic goals as you have less and less of a domestic population.  

The sales tax might be 10% or as high as  40% to ensure we are not too in debt to foreign powers. We are in debt now anyway  but not funding each citizen  with the foreign loan monies  as intended in the loan. 24 cents a minute per citizen; 365 days per year is a small amount and all we would have to do is  ensure that we can make the payments on those foreign debts; increasing  the sales tax if necessary. It is always about 20% to 40% in Europe.  This is easy for the North American economy  to achieve.  The SU7; I wonder what will happen once consumer buying power is assured across North America..  The vehicle could be sold in Europe as an Opel maybe?     It certainly confirms our regenerative, electric and non fossil fuel expectations.      Clearly, the SU7 is more than a telephone with wheels.  It is an upscale  vehicle in the present  that arrives  almost from the technologically realisable future.  It is a car for that exciting future but here today; with more than a hands  free lane assist that  is enjoyed  on some other consumer products.  

We look forward to seeing the vehicle available maybe from an online seller and possibly at a dealer show room later on in 2024.

The most important issue in all of this productivity, evidently robotically made, is the little bit of money to be paid to the North American consumers every day in an income support so that they could buy one of these cool, environmentally necessary electric machines in the less well funded Anglo markets outside of the consumer happy Asian Market;  where all Asian consumers have a sufficient, full and total income support.     

I expect to see an SU7 on the road and in driveways. It's common kingly cool!  

Copyright: Warren Lyon. 

 Automotive Television(TM) , 2024.