The EV and the future: Some say there will be an all electric future for vehicles. But, it seems there is work for all manufacturers in finding the perfect EV future. Is there a totally regenerative EV that does not require plug in recharging or maybe very little plug in recharging as in only 4 minutes to full charge? We know the human population found such technology and used it, the fly wheel and alternator technology, during WW2 since what is the point of a military tank if you have no idea when you could ever refuel it and you need it in your war strategy; you need right away that EV vehicle in your environment preservation strategy. The real issue in our prayers while we recharge is the cost of replacing the big battery and maybe multiple alternators is the best bet. Multiple, smaller Alternators can hold the charge more efficiently. This totally regenerative EV that does not require plug in charging; is it the EV from MG, the Taycan, the Tesla, the NEVS Emily GT, the SU7 or the Audi E Tron? Are some of these vehicles totally regenerative but pretending to be plug in dependent? Is the perfect EV out there or is it still on the way and in the process of being designed? The point of this discussion is to point out that recharging a vehicle for more than an hour after 400 miles of range on a long drive with that woman beside you and the kids in the back is quite wicked really and not impressive? But, maybe it gives the family more time to think, pray and shop for some other EV that will not include this much built in prayer time where we pray for the environment while waiting for the vehicle to recharge. No matter what, we should not think that the plug in EV is the pinnacle of EV technology. If not, we have to build it then it is best that the plug in EV is a hybrid that uses non liquid gas fuels. The real issue here is a market full of new technological options and some will win with consumers in terms of cost to own and maintain and also time convenience. |It would never be logical to think you are saving the future or the environment with these large battery vehicles that require a lot of time to recharge. It seems the hydrogen fuel cell wins in terms of cost, time convenience and simplicity. The battery EV will lose since it is just harassing to think of a 300 mile range and then the battery needs full recharging. 300 miles could be 4 hours of driving and then you are back to the plug.

The EV and the future:  Some say there will  be an all electric future for vehicles. But, it seems there is work for all manufacturers in finding the perfect EV future.   

   Is there a totally regenerative EV that does not require plug in recharging or maybe very little plug in recharging as in only 4 minutes to full charge?  We know the human population found such technology and used it, the fly wheel and alternator technology, during WW2 since what is the point of a military tank if you have no idea when you could ever refuel it and you need it in your war strategy; you need right away that EV vehicle in your environment preservation strategy. The real issue in our prayers while we recharge is the cost of replacing the big battery and maybe multiple alternators is the best bet. Multiple, smaller  Alternators can hold the charge more efficiently.  

 This totally regenerative EV that does not require plug in charging; is it the EV from MG, the Taycan, the Tesla, the NEVS Emily GT, the SU7 or the Audi E Tron? Are some of these vehicles totally regenerative but pretending to be plug in dependent?    Is the perfect EV out there or is it still on the way and in the process of being designed? The point of this discussion is to point out that recharging a vehicle for more than an   hour after 400 miles of range  on a long drive with that woman beside you and the kids in the back is quite wicked really and not impressive? But, maybe it gives the family more time to think, pray and shop for some other EV that will not include this much built in prayer time where we pray for the environment while waiting for the vehicle to recharge.    

No matter what, we should not think that the plug in EV is the pinnacle of EV technology.

If not, we have to build it then it is best that the plug in EV is a hybrid that uses non liquid gas fuels.    The real issue here is a market full of new technological options and some will win with consumers in terms of cost to own and maintain and also time convenience.    |It would never be logical to think you are saving the future or the environment with these large battery vehicles that require a lot of time to recharge.    It seems the hydrogen fuel cell wins in terms of cost, time convenience  and simplicity.    The battery EV will lose since it is just harassing to think of a 300 mile range and then the battery needs full recharging. 300 miles could be 4 hours of driving and then you are back to the plug.