23 September, 2023. Ford and the Wagner Act. By FSJ. (With research from Angel Ronan Entwerfen and Warren A. Lyon) We should be closer to Europe in terms of essential policies; closer to the mandate in our founding ancestral American documents. We hold these truths to be self evident; that all men, women and transgender people are to be funded with an income support benefit equally. ClIck here.

     23 September, 2023. 

Ford and the Wagner Act.  

By FSJ. 

(With research from Angel Ronan Entwerfen and Warren A. Lyon)

We should be closer to Europe in terms of essential policies; closer to the mandate in our founding ancestral American documents. We hold these truths to be self evident; that all men, women and transgender people are to be funded with an income support benefit equally.

  

It may have been Ford's reliance on government finance via the Wagner Act that made much of its work and dissemination of automobile technology possible. It might have been a suggestion.   But, he did not accept that the citizen would need an income support and that such income support would ensure his little American market.  It was little when there was no national income support program and most of his vehicles were built and shipped but not paid for fully.  They did not have the ability to pay.  It is also doubtful how they calculated the whole process of sale and delivery in those early days.  The Wagner Act helped to assuage the gap in payment, assurance, delivery and distribution.   The government paid about 10 percent above cost for every vehicle built and Ford wanted an abundant work force that would need to work.  It was dangerous and he was not always sure if he would have enough people who would want to take the risks if they did not need to work for their meals.  Maybe he thought  an income  support would affect the cost of labor in his guttural industrial tycoon guttural instinct and opinions.  But, Ford is not synonymous with English or the preservation of the English genome. There is an issue  here that crosses over onto the terrain of national defence and population reservation that is usually  addressed  by Generals and politicians. How can we safeguard the national standard from undue influence that can be wielded by fashion designers or vehicle designers?  How different is Ford from Hershey in this regard and if there is a difference why is there a difference?  What if Ford built and sold furniture and nothing else?   You invite  someone  into your circles as a master golf course builder and how does he start deciding the worth of your population?  After he does, you have a war, a depression and another war.  But, it's not his fault. Gold course designers are not Generals really.  But, maybe the argument  in money culture was a threat to industrial colleagues in other parts of the world; a genome conflict in the very end.  

All citizens had an income support in Europe that buttressed the European economies during early waves of industrialism.  The informal occupants did not have this income support but could work illegally it seems in the mercy of the culture.  Maybe you adopt them as landed permanent residents but not full citizens and pay them 70 percent of the income support paid to the regular citizen.   It was a problem when even the work reserved for the informal illegal occupants would be taken up by automation.   Some acted like they did not know what to say or do with them.    Once he saw there might be a pretender  about every so often in the French  constabulary,  The French leader  designed a painting  to catch him. The painting  criticized the king.  It is a criticism.  It is shame.  Who would dare to paint it? The painting depicted the people suffering and begging for bread.    But those were serfs without formal papers or aboriginals from North America without formal papers and who would ever say this is anything the King would tolerate and be criticized? He would not; but if you think he would tolerate it and not reflect, you would emulate the painting in pretense of being what you imagine him to be in that painting and in your diffidence  of the established current French culture with an income support and so in your emulation your population would disappear.   Did this happen in America with Ford? 

When the industrialist has opinions that are wrong, the 'given' should correct him. It is given that an income support is a requisite for an economy.  It costs only 11.8 cents per minute per North American, 24 hours per day and 365 days per year. It is given that hinges are needed for doors.  What would it do for Ford if all of those past years or for the years going forward, every North American has the ability to pay for his Electric Mustang Mach II  or his Electric Explorer? Did you know Ford has a major stake in Mazda and may own a significant share of Tata; maybe all of it?  What if you did own the all the automotive manufacturing world, with production paid for by the government with human labor or machine  labor, in some government industrial complex but your vehicles have no buyers or no buyers except for some in 15 out of 50 states? We see that one penny per minute paid to every North American would have helped maintain the market that Ford was busy trying to serve in his industrialism that also included certainly job cancelling automation. With that one penny a minute, it would have cancelled all of the trepidation and essential economic civil war that was visited upon America in the absence of a total income support for every citizen.  We calculate one penny a minute paid every minute every day for 365 days in the year works out to just over $5000.00.  8 cents a minute is about $40,000.00 per year.  Ford is building for the entire economy or he used to and per order or per sale.  Either way, the ability to pay (ATP) and purchase the vehicle should be the same across the entire national dealership network for every the entire population in the entire economy.  19 cents a minute is  $100,000.00 per year.  

But, people  want to work for the pride, the involvement and the dignity and to avoid the boredom, being at home watching your wife squeeze the pimples on her face. Instead, we can tattoo our employee # on her.    People will still want to work. 

But, truthfully the lack of an income support affected his likelihood of finding a real paying buyer across the country and he was inoculated from needing any real average  consumer buyers due to the Wagner Act where Ford was covered  by the government  for the cost of every chassis and also for labor costs.  

But this did not mean the world was not falling down around him in a depression and in violent economic desperation; especially in the Midwest where he did lay people off every so often. 

Yet, the number of people needed to work was being reduced every year with automation improvements.  

 The Wagner Act is the Government industrial complex.  An income support of .50 cents per hour as income support in 1929 would have been enough to prevent a depression.  Ford may have shown some Big industrial ingenuity but this was overwhelmed by a civilizational backwardness when he was called on for leadership on the issue of an income support in the Midwest when such income support was standard policy on the Eastern seaboard; including New York.  

You can see that if it's an economy, and this is not an argument, the economy must have an income support.  You could not really design a big, sweet candy bar and then use that as a mantle to argue with economic conventions or established design conceptions. You notice all doors have hinges. You have done well with doors and candies. All economies , however, have an income support in equal protection and equal payment to every citizen. 

 All New Yorkers received an income support of varying amounts up to 1980 of $12,000.00 per year.  After 1980, it became $40,000 for some and none for everyone else. 

There was no income support in Ford's Michigan apparently in the 1900's and still there was no support for the Michigan citizens of the 1980's.  

Illinois began a full income support in the '70s.  There are still states today  without  any income support.  But we say all men are  created equal.  We hold this Truth to be self evident. Then, they should be funded equally.  I have Ukrainian ancestry and I love America; don't you? Shouldn't we teach America and fund all the citizens equally? We should. The Ukraine should show them, maybe do it for them.  Buz right now you act like you are fighting submission to an equation, to logic or to happy solutions.  All serious major cultures  have an income support vs. Grumbling cultures.  Maybe you are a major culture  via your media proliferation but you are not a serious culture.  The Chinese are serious.  You are joking. You must be joking.  If you do not have a total Income support for every citizen, you are a grumbling culture.  If someone tells you that your shoe lace is untied, do you resent them, want to kill them and say "...you never told me but God told me?"

America had its divergent income support cultures that presented a dichotomy in the national consumer experience that Ford's industrialism presented.  

You can offer an American dream to the whole world but who would want it when it's incomplete?  It does not have the automated money like all of the other more senior, established cultures with their own more complete God loving dreams.  

The issue is that North America and the dream must have some root in something else that gave authorship to the dream.  The Pharaoh authored Joseph to pay a stipend to all of the citizens of Egypt and those who sought refuge during the cash shortage caused by the famines. Jesus authored  Peter, when commissioning him to start the church, to feed the sheep, feed the people really.  

When calling on the native Aboriginals to help them in the fight for independence Toussaint  L'overture (aka John Adams) said things will improve, will improve if you would help him and he abused their faith in him.  He seems to have delayed payment west of New York.  Who is he really?  What is going on? Today, we only need to pay every North American $5.90 /hr as income support or maybe $7.00/hr 24 hours per day and 365 days per year as income support to ensure that there is no depression in light of all of the automation in the current era.  I love all the people, white, red and black, not being paid any income and ask them to work with their politician to save us all.  

Ford was a celebrated designer of industrial machinery and rudimentary early vehicle products.  He was not the designer of economies.  But, when you fail to provide an income support for every citizen your economy is flat generally even if you are building 24 hours per day with machines or with a human work force population indicative of the late 1920's. 

It could  produce  big stories of tragedy, emblemised  in movies.  There could be stories of new discovery or uses in technology; stories that make us feel grand as we hear or read about them.  Then, when you employ some people you will see how your economy increases in activity, at the department stores and then when you remove some workers from the work force with automation, the economy slows violently.  The Shopping Malls are closing once automation becomes ubiquitous.   The issue is that automation  moves like a phantom across all economic sectors.   The farm job has disappeared in pace with the disappearance of the automotive job. 

 As such, the economy is always cyclical but you would generally be shrinking economically over time due to automation as your field of able buyers with ATP ( ability to pay) is shrinking and if there was no income support, you would have to close as an economy eventually, evidently.  But, maybe this closure would never happen regardless of your failure to pay an internationally normal income support to the North American citizens if you could create a nomadic transient placebo population that has its own income support that would take the North American's place in the economy.

 The North American people would have insufficient money to absorb the robotic production.  The Eastern seaboard could not do it all on its own.  Did we pay for Ford's reluctance to agree to a national standard income support? Did this affect England's ability to lead? Did a corporation  become the de facto seat in the English world? 

It's unusual that it does not exist nationally in two of the larger North American nations that celebrate  their more Heineken or Carlsberg ancestry vs. their cerveza ancestry.  The income support is always essential to prevent such economic closure.  The North American economy is not consistent, not stable.  Hiring a surrogate population to wall paper or cover our own financial absence in the economy is not the solution.  Ford's vehicles have adapted to more fuel efficient technology, "people saving, life saving"technology. He would not be offended with a "people saving" economy.  Maybe Ford could build one impressive prototype vehicle today. Could he build a prototype regenerative economy in a state or province if he had the chance to do it; paying the people an income support of maybe 11.8 cents per minute / $7.10 per hour 24 hours per day 365 days per year on a bi monthly payment cycle and then the economy will regeneratively recoup the money (take the money back) at the cash register, on the electrical bill, the water bill and the gas bill; the rent also in government owned condo units in existing finished buildings,  paying rent. Our population  is worth it; our entire tiny population. See the Chinese. See the Europeans.  It could be subsidised if you only have income support and no full time job. Maybe it's subsidised  on your tax return where you say you did not work in the calendar year and you get a $200.00 per month tax rebate.  Did you get your OTB benefit or your GST benefit?  I have notification but it has not been credited to my account in some fraud. She is now arrested for her Terrorist interruption of a government process at the bank back office with her AS 400 system interference. She is locked out.  

 Each condo projects owes the government 10% of its units since 1990.  The sales tax might be a bit higher or maybe not. What do you think?  The 3/4 ground fish and 1/4 ground sausage burger!!   

The European market has been dear to Ford as it has an income support that covers every citizen in its economy. The amount  is comparably equal from state to state and payment  begins from 10 years old. They thank God and their country.  North America is supposed to be a European feeder economy. Europe;  it is consistent and stable. To enable the North American economy to move in line with the European economy, an income support must be employed immediately in paying every citizen.  We would all want to be closer to Europe in style immediately and in common sense.  Maybe once Ford waited to see the market just start selling vehicles for him. England followed; it seems. Two world wars ensued.  But we know the answer now. We would want the economy to work.  Ford wills it.  But delay in doing so is...to delay the market. 

 You might have your money due to the Wagner Act or you once did and you have your vehicle brand.  But, without  consistent immigration with people  that being their own money to cover the population and the money deficit, you have an insufficient North American buyer;  no people.   We could always rely on Asia for a surrogate population maybe as you argue and confidently manage your disappearance.    What do you think?  

We have our big brand but not a lot of people and also  a big chocolate brand. We have a King and we would like to enjoy all of the bigness as European Creoles in our little  North American corner with an economy that submits to European standards.  

Written by Farley Mowat's student graduate( one of them).