Posts

Showing posts from 2019
Show All
Image
Post a Comment
Image

Warren A. Lyon, Automotive Journalist.

Post a Comment
Image

Porsche's 70th Anniversary! The Porsche Plug-In Hybrid.

Post a Comment
Image

Audi.

Post a Comment
Image

New Porsche 911 992 Carrera S.

Post a Comment
Image

Porsche!

Post a Comment
Image

Warren A. Lyon; merit listed Jag Officer Candidate is here at the 2019 Canadian International Auto Show.

Post a Comment
Image

The Canadian International Auto Show.

Post a Comment
Image

Auto Show(TM Automotive photography by Warren A. Lyon.

Post a Comment
Image

Auto Show(TM) Automotive Photography.

Post a Comment
Image

Auto Work(TM) Television by Warren A. Lyon.

Post a Comment
Image

Londinium Media(TM) was at the 2019 Honda Indy.

Post a Comment
Image

Auto Work Television(TM); Ford GT. The copyright in this photo belongs to Warren A. Lyon.

Post a Comment

This just in; Warren A. Lyon proposes that the new vehicle surround cameras and interior cameras should be a theft deterrent system that's capable of recording any activities near or within the vehicle at all times whether or not the vehicle is on. The patent in this technological update with patent pending belongs to Warren A. Lyon at 1-914-539-7655. Email: w.a.lyon.angelronan@mail.com. Warren A. Lyon is an automotive journalist.

Post a Comment
Image

This is not a free photo. Enjoy World Press Freedom Day! Thank you! Warren A. Lyon; Journalist.

Post a Comment
Image

2020 Chevrolet Tahoe.

Post a Comment
Image

A long time ago, the Europeans designed a regenerative vehicle before WW1. The hydro-electric power generation station is really a large electric engine with the river turning the wheel. Smaller engines existed evidently like the automatic watch as an example that is more than a watch. It is an engine. The hydrogen powered vehicle was the European answer for a vehicle that would run on a fuel. They did not need it but it was designed. The Americans insisted on a liquid fuel that was portable and visible that you could hand to your neighbor if he ran out of fuel but who would run out of fuel in a hydrogen vehicle that you would need a neighbour to help you? The Europeans won the logical argument; for hegemony. This vehicle is 100 percent robotically assembled. The economy is dependent on people. The economy that has the most people with the most minimum income support wins as sales tax dollars are generated for the nation by sales at the cash register. Toyota! Hydrogen! We really don't need a dual economy in the vehicle industry since you must have noticed Honda's electric engines on each wheel hub capable of generating as much free energy horse power you want. On the Civic, it generates 90 horsepower and the gasoline engine is just to avoid your trauma. But, if you insist on a vehicle fuel economy this is the solution.

Post a Comment
Image

Click here: The KIA Habaniro concept vehicle at the New York Auto Show: KIA confirms that this concept will be a production vehicle for the 2020 model year. It is a standard SUV with exciting new styling that satisfies the mid size market segment in league with more upscale offerings such as Range Rover's Evoque. The Habaniro is an all wheel, four seat electric vehicle in the SUV cross-over segment. You can look forward to seeing the vehicle at stoplights, on the highway and at your local KIA dealer in North America soon.

Post a Comment
Image

2020 Cadillac CT5

Post a Comment
Image

The All New 2020 Cadillac CT5.

Post a Comment
Image

The 2020 Cadillac CT 5 is a great success at the 2019 New York Auto Show. Auto Work Television(TM) has more coming from the show soon!

Post a Comment
Image

The All New 2020 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500.

Post a Comment
Image

2020 Toyota Supra!

Post a Comment

This just in; Holy Cow pastures Batman!!!!; the Tesla is really a hydrogen vehicle.

Post a Comment
Image

2020 Porsche 992: Auto Show(TM) Automotive Photography By Warren A. Lyon.

Post a Comment
Image

2020 Ford GT at the 2019 Canadian International Auto Show. This vehicle was designed by Raj Nair. Warren A. Lyon designed the 8 speed semi automatic/ up down manual type gear shifter with all rights reserved belonging to Warren A. Lyon.

Post a Comment
Image

2020 Lincoln Aviator!

Post a Comment
Image

Jeep!

Post a Comment
Image

Benz!

Post a Comment
Image

2020 Hyundai Palisade.

Post a Comment
Image

2020 Nissan 370 Z.

Post a Comment
Image

Benz!

Post a Comment
Image

Click here! .

Post a Comment
Image

Mercedes!

Post a Comment
Image

Porsche!

Post a Comment
Image

Audi! This photo is dedicated to Leihland Lloyd who said as a father figure that a B was Good but that an A is better.

Post a Comment
Image

2019 Toronto International Auto Show.

Post a Comment
Image

Honda!

Post a Comment
Image

Honda!

Post a Comment

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50064/ It was at the eve of the previous century when the left of the time, represented in great part by the 2nd international, engaged in a debate on whether a “breakdown” is inherent in the dynamics of capitalist accumulation. The recovery of world capitalism from 1870-1890 depression drove prominent members of the international to proclaim the need to “revise” the Marxist heritage of the old social democracy. Economic works of the time, coming mainly from “legal Marxists”, argued that capitalism is an ever growing system, growth interrupted by recessions like the five and ten year cycles observed in capitalist economies, the latter attributed to disproportional-ties of various forms. Concluding that socialism does not emerge from economic necessity the “revisionists” preached in favor of gradual reforms ensuring that the working class will improve its position in the process of capitalist growth. This was the political line of the “right” wing of the old international where Edward Bernstein was the most prominent figure (Bernstein 18995 ). The most esteemed Marxist theorist of the time Karl Kautsky, who has the father of the term “revisionists”, did not particularly contest the notion of unimpeded growth under capitalism, although in various parts of his writings one can find under-consumption arguments. What he practically did was to reduce the notion of “breakdown” to a situation of an irreversible downturn in capitalist accumulation and argue that no such conviction was held by Marx. On these grounds he teamed with O. Bauer who took the argument further suggesting that the law of the falling rate of profit cannot function as the basis of a “breakdown theory”. In this regard Bauer presented a simulation of Marx’s schemes of expanded reproduction (Bauer 19136 ) showing that although the rate of profit kept declining by construction, profits (mass of profit) increased. The simulation was misleading, Bower stopped calculating after the fourth period but when the simulation is extended to multiple periods the mass of profit declines indicating a breakdown in accumulation, however this was shown almost twenty years later by Henryk Grossman (Grossman 19297 ). For the time Kautsky and Bauer, agreeing that socialism is a matter of “social consciousness” and not economic necessity, formed the “center” faction of the 2nd International. The political line of the “center” accepted the preaching of the right that the labor class should make the most of accumulation under capitalism but kept also the socialist potential as a matter for the future. What identified the left of the international was the conviction that the interests of the troubled masses cannot be satisfied in the capitalist mode of production (without a basic income that satisfies the masses but in the benefit of capitalism, its capitalist producers and owners of the factories and retail that will have a guaranteed, more certain ROI on consumption and the system earns 20%) and this willi nevitably lead to an insurrection led by the working class. In this context the primary duty of social democracy was to agitate and prepare this liberating event. Both prominent figures of the “left”, V. Lenin and R. Luxemburg, shared this revolutionary commitment however they took different approaches on the “breakdown” issue. Luxemburg acknowledged that if capitalism was a system of unimpeded growth then socialism “loses its granite foundation of objective historical necessity” deducted to the “mere injustice and badness of the present-day world. ---- In the book “Accumulation of Capital” (Luxemburg R. 1913 8) Luxemburg put forward an under-consumption argument, suggesting that growth in capitalism was contingent on demand coming from non-capitalist regions. She proclaimed that an increasing gap between workers consumption, capitalist consumption and replacement (of labor ) by machinery on one hand and total product value on the other prevails in capitalist reproduction. It made no sense, to her, for capitalists to close this gap through savings and investment since the capitalist class will be realizing this way part of its own surplus value. Missing the mere fact that this is exactly what capitalist production is all about, to invest profits, borrowed funds or both in an effort to make more profits, she concluded that when capitalism will dominate globally this will coincide with its inevitable end since value will remain unrealized. Capitalism here really refers to Anglo -North American diffidence; not pure global Capitalism represented by Volkswagen or Citroën, Lada or Toyota. Lenin recognized in Luxemburg’s work the under-consumption argument of the Narodniks he had attacked in his 1899 pamphlet “The Development of Capitalism in Russia” (Lenin V. 18999). In his view crises emerge because of disproportional growth of department I (production of means of production) relative to department II (production of means of consumption) a fluctuation similar to the ten year cycle observed in capitalist economies. Therefore contrary to Luxemburg the historical necessity of socialism does not emerge from the inherent contradictions of growth under capitalism. It is capitalist development itself, leading to the greatest socialization of production and the narrowest personal appropriation of its results, which brings the necessity for socialist transformation (Lenin 191310). A position similar to that of the “center” with the difference that Lenin held the conviction that the capitalist state cannot be transformed to a socialist one (Lenin 191711) and that the impulsive insurrection of the masses can be turned to a conscious struggle for socialism only through the mediation of the vanguard of the proletariat, in other words the communist party, the latter his most important political invention in the words of the Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm. In conclusion the first decade of the 20th century found the left of the day in absolute confusion on the argument underlying Max’s Capital. Especially for the center and the left faction, at a time when strong growth, which followed the last depression, was beginning to fade and the drums of the forthcoming war were clearly heard, a persuasive argument supporting the preaching for socialism was missing. This was the reason which led both the center and the left to clink so heavily on the book by Rudolf Hilferding “Finance Capital” which came out in Vienna in 1910. The books’ main argument claimed to originate from Marx’s theory of concentration and centralization of capital, Marx’s most undisputed prediction in the words of Wassily Leontief.

Post a Comment
Image

Toyota!

Post a Comment
Image

Porsche!

Post a Comment